Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2026-09-30 Origin: Site
After water or ethanol extraction of medicinal herbs, the crude extract contains not only desired small‑molecule bioactive substances, but also various impurities. Among them, polymerized tannins, lignin decomposition products and natural pigments are the main sources of dark brown color. Excessive pigment will make final product poor in appearance, influence product stability and bring difficulty to subsequent concentration and spray‑drying steps.
Activated carbon decolorization is the mainstream traditional method. Powdered activated carbon is mixed into extract solution to adsorb pigments, then filtered out. However, this chemical‑adsorption process has inherent defects. Activated carbon is non‑selective, it adsorbs partial active constituents together with pigments, resulting in yield reduction. Spent activated carbon forms solid waste, requiring special waste disposal. Decolorization effect is easily influenced by carbon® dosage, stirring time and temperature, causing inconsistent quality between production batches.
Nanofiltration membrane separation takes advantage of molecular weight cut‑off and charge effect. High‑molecular pigment substances are intercepted on the retentate side. Most target small‑molecule effective components permeate through membrane together with solvent. The whole decolorization procedure is completed under relatively low temperature, no solid adsorbent added. It avoids thermal damage to heat‑sensitive ingredients.
Several key factors determine practical decolorization performance. Solution pH value changes charge property of pigments, which further affects interception effect. Operating temperature should be properly controlled, high temperature accelerates membrane fouling while too low temperature reduces permeate flux. Transmembrane pressure needs reasonable adjustment to balance processing capacity and decolorization result. Continuous production requires periodic CIP cleaning to eliminate organic fouling layer on membrane surface and restore flux.
For plant extract manufacturers, nanofiltration decolorization brings obvious advantages. It reduces active substance loss and improves product yield. It eliminates consumption of activated carbon and cuts solid waste generation. The membrane system can run continuously and be integrated into existing extraction line.
It should be noted that nanofiltration cannot remove all pigments one‑hundred percent. For heavily colored raw liquid, pre‑treatment is necessary. Sometimes mild carbon treatment can be combined with nanofiltration to achieve ideal color requirement. As membrane material keeps improving, nanofiltration will become a valuable alternative solution for herbal extract decolorization industry.